<![CDATA[
I dunno exactly how I feel about this guy. I'm fairly libertarian, but I've also got a strong pragmatic streak that bristles at the thought of someone who governs solely via ideal, without the occasional nod to immediate reality.
It is impressive, though, to come across a politician of any kind who is so passionately devoted to the vision of the Founding Fathers, rather than that of a lobbyist or the voice of Jebus in his ear.
USNews.com: Inside Washington: 10 Things You Didn't Know About Ron Paul
Paul received the nickname "Dr. No" in Congress for repeatedly casting "nay" votes, even on legislation with almost unanimous support from his Republican colleagues. Explaining why he opposes legislation that expands government power, funds federal spending, or reduces privacy: "I interpret through the eyes of the Constitution. If we don't have direct authorization, I don't vote for it, even if there are good intentions." In 2006, the Washington Post wrote: "He says, if his fellow Republicans are 'very desperate,' he may allow himself to be talked into changing a 'no' vote to 'present.' "
]]>